Friday 5 March 2021

Disability in Royal Courts

Henry VIII with family and Court Fools By Unknown author - tudorhistory.org/elizabeth/gallery.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3762404

 

Welcome to my latest blog post. Last week I looked at the interesting life of Jeffrey Hudson, the 17th Century court dwarf. This week I have decided to examine the royal court more closely and see why so many disabled people could be found there. Unlike some of my other posts, I will not be focusing on any particular time, person, or place. Instead, I will be talking about royal courts throughout time. The king (or queen) had an important role to play in the makeup of the royal court, obviously, so I will begin by surmising why they chose disabled people.

Kingship and Disability: Are there Similarities?

I’m going to start by stating the obvious. Throughout history kings and queens have been powerful people. The disabled people who served in their courts on the other hand were the lowest of the low. How then could there be any similarities between the two? In many Christian countries, kings were thought of as being close to God, as well as being good and just. Therefore, it was important for them to be surrounded by positive energy. I wonder did they try meditation? You may remember from previous posts such as The Curse of The Evil Eye and Disability vs The Evil Eye, that the Greeks and Romans believed disabled people were able to ward off evil by just being their plain old deformed selves.

As usual, I am attacking this topic with gigantic brush strokes, but I am fairly confident that the overall point is solid. As you would expect, rulers, whose job it was to inspire confidence in their people, did not want to be plagued by evil spirits. Now that I think about it, I don’t think anyone would want to be plagued by evil spirits. To stop this from happening, the ruler would fill his/her court with deformed people to literally surround themself with protection.

The Role of Religion

So, that strategy of surrounding yourself with deformed people seemed to work well against the evil eye. However, why did the practice continue after popular belief in the eye faded? Part of the answer is probably that deformed courtiers became commonplace and they just forgot why they were there in the first place. Another probability, which is quite depressing, is that the deformities themselves were seen as funny and entertaining to look at. As the monarch was the most powerful person in their kingdom, it was only fair that they had the coolest stuff, right? If the coolest stuff happened to be people with physical abnormalities, then so be it.

There were more important reasons why monarchs from the Medieval period onwards filled their courts with disabled people. While the evil eye and evil spirits were not very prominent, God certainly was! When it came to disabled people in royal courts, God was front and centre in the minds of monarchs. For a long time, the Christian churches held vast amounts of power in Europe. As such, if a monarch wanted to be successful, they needed the support of the church.

I don’t think I have touched on this before but being charitable towards disabled people was important to the church. Therefore, by including disabled people in their courts, monarchs would gain the approval of the church, as they had rescued the disabled person from a life of poverty. This was certainly true for Jeffrey Hudson who I discussed last week.

The Role of the Fool

There were also certain qualities which some disabled people possessed, which meant that it was important they stayed close to the monarch. This is best seen when looking at court fools. Their role was to entertain the monarch and their guests by telling jokes and generally clowning around. It has been argued that court fools were actually people with intellectual disabilities. You see, people who now would be diagnosed with intellectual disabilities were referred to as ‘natural fools’, predominantly in the Medieval and Tudor periods. They were thought to be insensible of their actions, or more generally incapable. This gave them an aura of innocence and pureness. They were deemed to be untainted by the ills of humanity and closer to God than anybody else.

If in ancient times, deformed slaves could protect the ruler from evil, Medieval and Early Modern monarchs could be brought closer to God by the disabled people in their court.

To keep up to date with my latest blog posts, you can like my Facebook page, or follow me on Twitter. You can find them by clicking the relevant icons in the sidebar.

Next time, I will be writing a post on a different topic. I am going to leave it as a surprise! I guess you're going to have to come back to discover what it is.

 

                                                The Wheelchair Historian

 

Further Reading

Lipscomb, Suzannah,All the King’s Fools’, Published in History Today Volume 61 Issue 8 August 2011, https://www.historytoday.com/archive/all-king%E2%80%99s-fools Accessed: 5th March 2021.

Maitland, Karen, ‘What was life like for a court jester?’ https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/what-was-life-like-for-a-court-jester/ Accessed: 5th March 2021.

Trentin, Lisa, 2011. ‘Deformity in the Roman Imperial Court’, Greece & Rome, 58, No. 2, 195-208 Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41306156 [Accessed: 19th November 2017].

 

Saturday 27 February 2021

Jeffrey Hudson: A court dwarf like no other

 

Jeffrey Hudson with Queen Henrietta Maria By Anthony van Dyck - https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.41651.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=150539

Welcome to my latest blog post. Last week I discussed how witchcraft relates to deformity. This week I will be shifting my focus to the realm of court dwarfs. Perhaps the most famous example of a court dwarf was Jeffrey Hudson. Before I begin to tell his tale, I should probably clarify a few things regarding terminology. While I understand that the term dwarf can be offensive, I am using it because that is what the history books use. You can find out more about that in my post on disability as entertainment in Ancient Rome. You can also find out more about my attitude towards offensive language here.

The Court Dwarf

Jeffrey Hudson was born in 1619, in the county of Rutland, England. Fittingly, Rutland is the smallest county in England. Hudson’s family were poor, and they feared that Jeffrey’s height restriction would result in him being stuck in poverty forever. As strange as it may sound to us today, they were more than happy to release Jeffrey into the care of the Duke and Duchess of Buckingham. George Villiers, the Duke, was keen to gain the favour of the royal family and served Jeffrey in a pie to the queen!

I should probably rephrase that and explain it better. A pie was made 2 feet tall and 2 feet wide and presented to Henrietta Maria, the wife of Charles I at a 1626 banquet. This next part reminds me of that scene from 'Alien' as 7-year-old Jeffrey poked his hand through the crust and startled the queen. She then realised that it was a small child in a full suit of armour and was greatly entertained by the spectacle. She was delighted to hear that he was hers to keep and took him home with her.

I know it’s strange that he pretty much was her pet, but he and Henrietta Maria became close as he was always in her presence. Jeffrey Hudson was not the only unusual person in the royal court. There was also a Welshman called William Evans who was reportedly 7ft 6in tall. He had an act involving Jeffrey that was a real crowd pleaser. He pulled a loaf of bread out of one of his jacket pockets and from the other produced Jeffrey. I’m sure it was a sight to behold!

The English Civil War

In 1642 the English Civil War broke out between those who supported the crown, the Royalists, and those who opposed it, the Parliamentarians. Unsurprisingly, Henrietta Maria, being the king’s wife, was in favour of the crown. This also meant that Jeffrey Hudson had to support the king. I assume he would have anyway, given that he helped him escape poverty. Hmmm…. how to skip over the dull war bits and get back to Hudson’s role? Basically, it all became very nasty and in 1649 Charles I lost his head, literally. So that’s what happened in the war. I mean, much more happened but that doesn’t really concern me right now. While the war was going on (before the beheading), Hudson was not just sitting idly by. It is possible that he actually fought against the Parliamentarians at one point and was given the title ‘Captain of the horse’. It is clear that he was more than just a court dwarf.

All Downhill from Here

The tide of the war turned against the Royalists forcing Henrietta Maria and her entourage, including Hudson, to flee to France. It was here that Hudson’s life began to fall apart. Has anyone in history ever had a happily ever after, or is that just in fairy tales? Anyway, Jeffrey was fed up with people mocking him because of his height. This came to a head in October 1644, when he challenged Charles Crofts to a duel. Crofts was the brother of the queen’s master of horse, so he was deemed important. Jeffrey mounted his horse, gun in hand and charged towards Crofts who continued to mock him. It probably came as a shock then when the bullet Jeffrey fired lodged in Crofts’ brain, killing him instantly. So, killing someone usually doesn’t go down well, but matters were made worse for Hudson because duelling was illegal in France. Henrietta Maria had no option other than removing him from her court entirely.

Things only got worse from there. During his journey back to England he was captured by Barbary pirates and made a slave in North Africa for 25 years. Not much is known about this period of his life, but it can be assumed that he was harshly treated. We do know that he was back in Rutland when Henrietta Maria died in 1669. Phew! He escaped slavery, at least all his hardships were over. No! Apparently, there was still more to come. Upon returning to London, Hudson discovered that there was strong anti-Catholic sentiment and was thrown in jail after being recognised as the Catholic queen’s dwarf. He was eventually released and died forgotten around 1682.

It is fair to say that Jeffrey Hudson was not a typical court dwarf and his life had many ups and downs.

To keep up to date with my latest blog posts, you can like my Facebook page, or follow me on Twitter. You can find them by clicking the relevant icons in the sidebar.

Next time I will look at disability and kingship, or something along those lines.

 

                                                                The Wheelchair Historian

 

Further Reading

Dvorsky,George, ‘The true story of Sir Jeffery Hudson, the real-life Tyrion Lannister’, 10/01/13 12:50PM https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-true-story-of-sir-jeffery-hudson-the-real-life-tyr-1434495288 Accessed: 27th February 2021.

Harris, Marea, ‘Sir Jeffrey Hudson – Swashbuckling Court Dwarf Served in a Pie to a King’, Aug 22, 2018 https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/08/22/sir-jeffrey-hudson/  Accessed: 27th February 2021.

National Portrait Gallery, ‘Jeffrey Hudson (1619-1682), Dwarf and favourite of Queen Henrietta Maria’ https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp02305/jeffrey-hudson Accessed: 27th February 2021.

Woolf, John, ‘The amazing life of Jeffrey Hudson, the queen’s dwarf’, Published: January 3, 2020 at 11:21 am https://www.historyextra.com/period/stuart/amazing-life-jeffrey-hudson-queen-henrietta-maria-dwarf/ Accessed: 27th February 2021.