Friday 25 December 2020

Tiny Tim's Troublesome Tale

Tiny Tim By Fred Barnard - Digital image from LIFE, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6079747

 

Welcome to my special Christmas post. It took me a while to decide what I should write about. I wanted it to be festive, but also be a history post with a disability aspect. As you are probably aware, the history of disability and Christmas cheer don’t really go hand in hand. The only thing I could think of that I could put a positive spin on was Tiny Tim from Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol (1843). When I initially looked up Tiny Tim online, I came across the singer by that name. While fascinating, he was not the person I was looking for, so I carried on my search. Anyway, what follows is what I was able to cobble together in an attempt to make a usually bleak subject Christmassy and magical!!

 

What the Dickens?

I must admit that I know rather little about Charles Dickens. You may remember from my post on Zip the Pinhead, that Dickens was the one who gave Barnum the idea to call Zip, ‘What is it?’. This gave me the impression that Dickens, much like many of his 19th century counterparts did not actually care about disabled people and either feared or pitied them. This may not have been the case. Perhaps the reason that Dickens attended one of Barnum’s exhibits was because he had a keen interest in human illness.

Tiny Tim is possibly the best-known disabled child in the works of Dickens, but he was not the only one. In 1845, Dickens published A Cricket on the Hearth, in which one of the characters, Bertha, is blind. She is the daughter of an employee of a prideful toy merchant. I am starting to think that Dickens liked to repeat the same stories and hoped that nobody would notice. Much like Tiny Tim, Bertha is a happy child, even though she is expected to be miserable due to her disability. It seems as though Dickens is saying being/becoming disabled is not the worst thing in the world, which even today is a common belief about disability.

Perhaps Dickens had a better understanding of disability and illness than he is given credit for. When Dickens was 12, his father was put in debtors’ prison, meaning that young Charles lived in poverty for a while. He also had personal experience of disability and ill health as he had epilepsy and his nephew died of tuberculosis at a young age. This may be where his character of Tiny Tim came from. Dickens was also incredibly skilled at identifying disease. In many of his works, he would accurately describe the symptoms of various illnesses that had not been identified yet. I think it is safe to say that Charles Dickens knew what he was talking about when he included the disabled Tiny Tim in A Christmas Carol.

 

What was Troubling Tiny Tim?

I know it is a fictional story that is over 150 years old, but it is still interesting to speculate what illness may have been afflicting Tiny Tim. It is important to note that whatever the problem was, his situation dramatically improved once Scrooge had a change of heart after being scared witless by some ghosts. It would have to be an illness that could be improved with money, but would prove fatal if neglected. Ah…. Death, that’s what you want to read about at Christmas time. Here is what we know about his problem. According to the book, Tiny Tim “bore a little crutch, and had his limbs supported by an iron frame.” He is also carried on the back of his father from the Christmas service to his home. Oh…. and he was small in stature, hence the adjective Tiny in his name.

There are several conditions which may explain Tiny Tim’s symptoms. Firstly, there is possibly the most obvious explanation. As A Christmas Carol is a book of fiction, Tiny Tim’s illness may be a metaphor for the ills of society in general. I like this explanation as I am fond of a good metaphor. However, as I am more interested in Tiny Tim’s illness, I will ignore the logical answer. One possible diagnosis is Renal Tubular Acidosis. This is a disease that affects the kidneys. It can lead to restricted growth, bone disease as well as a whole host of other issues. It is incredibly rare, so is an unlikely diagnosis, but was believed to be one of the conditions that Charles II of Spain was cursed with, as discussed a few months ago. Other conditions put forward over the years include polio and cerebral palsy. However, an increase in wealth and a better diet would be unlikely to dramatically change Tiny Tim’s fortunes if either of these were the cause.

Tuberculosis is a more probably explanation, as nearly 50% of children in London at this time had the disease, including the nephew of Charles Dickens as mentioned before. While it may have been difficult to treat back then, an improved diet and more sun exposure, provided by trips to a sanatorium may have helped. Another likely disease was rickets. This could be dealt with easily enough by an improved diet. Some people have pointed out that if a poor diet was the cause, then all the Cratchit children should have had rickets. However, as Tiny Tim was the youngest, his meals would have been the poorest quality. Given the evidence that we have to go on, a combination of rickets and TB is most likely.

 

Festive Cheer?

Okay. At the start of this post, I said I would try and do three things. 1. Talk about history, which I think I have done. 2. Talk about disability, which I think I have managed by haphazardly trying to diagnose a fictional character. 3. I said I would make it Christmassy, whatever that means. Let’s give that a go, shall we? Since his conception, Tiny Tim has become a poster boy for charities dealing with disability. He is the sweet little kid that makes everyone feel pity for him and empty their pockets, which works well at Christmas because everyone is in a giving mood. Some disabled people don’t like this as they rightly don’t want to be pitied. But hey, if it means people are kinder to each other, I’m all for it!

Fun Fact (I think it’s fun anyway): You may be aware of the phrase ‘Bah humbug’ from A Christmas Carol, but did you know that saying ‘Merry Christmas’ originated from this work as well!

To keep up to date with my latest blog posts, you can like my Facebook page, or follow me on Twitter. You can find them by clicking the relevant icons in the sidebar.

Next week I will have a New Year special. I just need to work out what it will be.

 

                                                                                                Merry Christmas!!

                                               

                                                                                   The Wheelchair Historian

 

Further Reading

Chesney, RW. Environmental Factors in Tiny Tim's Near-Fatal Illness. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(3):271–275. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.852 Accessed: 22nd December, 2020.

Hingston, Kylee-Anne, “A Christmas Carol,” Nineteenth-Century Disability: Cultures & Contexts, https://www.nineteenthcenturydisability.org/items/show/28 Accessed: December 22, 2020.

Kudlick, Catherine, ‘#Disabled People to the Rescue: A Christmas Carol’ https://longmoreinstitute.sfsu.edu/disabled-people-rescue-christmas-carol Accessed: 22nd December, 2020.

Palik, Jennifer, ‘What was wrong with Tiny Tim in 'A Christmas Carol'?’ Updated Jan 05, 2019; Posted Dec 25, 2011 https://www.pennlive.com/bodyandmind/2011/12/a_big_mystery_surrounding_tiny.html Accessed: 22nd December, 2020.

Soehnlin, Jenn, ‘What Charles Dickens Teaches Us About Disability in His Christmas Novellas’, Sunday, December 15, 2019 https://embracing.life/article/what-charles-dickens-teaches-us-about-disability-in-his-christmas-novellas Accessed: 22nd December, 2020.

Friday 18 December 2020

Bes: The Dwarf God

Dendera Bes By Olaf Tausch - Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15666212

 

Welcome to my new series which I have given the loose title ‘the history of beliefs about disability’. My hope is that I will travel through time and try to explain what certain societies believed about the causes of disabilities as well as the abilities of those afflicted. This series will be slightly different to my other series as it is not possible to understand people’s beliefs with facts and figures.


As always, I will endeavour to cover this topic in a chronological order. As such, I will begin with the earliest civilisation that I have studied in any detail. Yes, that’s right! We are heading back to ancient Egypt. What makes this post trickier is that I will not be examining a person, but rather a god. I’m aware that Pharaohs were considered gods, but I mean the not of this world, special powers, kind of god.


He Doesn’t Look the Bes(t)

Bes was an Egyptian god with an unusual appearance. He is most often depicted as a bearded dwarf, with his tongue sticking out. If you think that is strange, he also carried a rattle, or sometimes a snake. He was very different to any other Egyptian god you are likely to encounter. As far as I am aware, he is one of the only gods that always faces forward, rather than being shown in profile. Another difference between Bes and the other gods is that he was rarely shown with his clothes on. I’m sure if you encountered Bes in real life, he would certainly give you a bit of a shock. However, the strange body proportions, large tongue and…. em…. nudity, were not his only startling physical characteristics. He was shown as being part lion. He was usually equipped with a lion’s main and a tail which dangled down between his legs.


There has been some debate as to the origins of this unusual god. Some scholars have argued that he has origins in the kingdom of Nubia, which was just south of Egypt. They point to the fact that some of his characteristics show a resemblance to the Pygmy tribes, found even further to the south in the Congo River Basin. The idea being that the god emigrated north over time. This has been disputed, but is interesting, nonetheless. Bes first emerged in the Egyptian Middle Kingdom (1975 B.C.E. – 1640 B.C.E.) and became popular from the New Kingdom (1520 B.C.E. – 1075 B.C.E.) onwards. I don’t know about you, but my mind boggles when I realise that he could have been worshiped almost 4,000 years ago! Due to his leonine features, many scholars agree that originally, Bes may have been a lion rearing up on its hind legs, however, over time his depiction morphed into a dwarf like creature.


His Abilities

Every god of ancient civilisations such as the Egyptians served a specific purpose. If you were to look at an image of Bes you may think that he was the ancient Egyptian devil. Surely something with such a frightening appearance has malicious intent, right? Wrong! He was indeed a scary god, but only to evil spirits which wished to do humans and gods harm. You see, Bes was a protector god. His frightful appearance as well as rattles and/or snakes he shook in his hands served to keep evil demons at bay. I say evil demons because Bes was also a demon, but the good kind. While there were no temples or priests devoted to Bes, he was a very popular god among the Egyptian people. I would say that he protected the most vulnerable people in society as he watched over women and children. Mothers would invoke Bes as they were singing their children to sleep, so that he might keep nightmares at bay.


The Egyptians were not scared of Bes. In fact, they found him entertaining and sometimes even humorous. Whenever a baby would smile and laugh for no apparent reason, it was believed that Bes was pulling funny faces, which only the baby could see. Bes also had a crucial role to play in bringing babies to the Earth. Several amulets and instruments invoking Bes have been found in birthing houses. It was thought that Bes ensured a successful delivery with a healthy mother and baby. I wonder did they blame Bes when the delivery was not a success? Anyway, the mother to be wore a Bes amulet around her neck during the process. Bes was also invoked when a couple wanted to become pregnant, and there were special rooms under Bes’ guardianship where couples attempted to achieve their wish. Beautiful women were a popular target for evil spirits to attack. Therefore, images of Bes could be found on cosmetic items such as mirrors and hairpins to protect the woman in question. It is safe to say that Bes was kept busy.

Amulet of Bes; 1070–712 BC; faience; height: 3.7 cm; Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York City)
Amulet of Bes; 1070–712 BC; faience; height: 3.7 cm; Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York City)


His Legacy

While Bes was primarily an Egyptian god, his influence spread both far and wide. He reached his peak popularity in Egypt during the Ptolemaic Period (305 B.C.E. – 30 B.C.E.). From there he spread to the Roman Empire. Being the macho, all conquering super soldiers that they were, the Romans depicted Bes as a legionnaire. He was also popular in the Greek world and influenced Greek and Roman beliefs regarding dwarfs. I will move on to that topic in a few weeks.


There may be a reason why Bes’ appearance suggests to us that he is menacing. Through the passage of time, the Christian Church incorporated many aspects of his appearance to make the Devil. These include things such as the sticking out tongue and animal tail. Why would the Christian Church turn Bes (who protected people from evil) into the Devil? The main reason was that through his association with childbirth and reproduction, he also became popular with party goers. This flew in the face of the church’s stance on morals, family, and reproduction. It is for this same reason that the Devil has the cloven hooves of the Greek god Pan. The popularity of Bes also continued long enough to compete with early Christianity. Turning him into the Devil was an effective way to remove the competition.


I know Bes may not actually have been a dwarf, but beliefs surrounding him certainly influenced attitudes to disability later.


To keep up to date with my latest blog posts, you can like my Facebook page, or follow me on Twitter. You can find them by clicking the relevant icons in the sidebar.


Next week I will be putting up a post to mark Christmas.


                                                          The Wheelchair Historian    

Further Reading

Dasen, Veronique, 1993. Dwarfs in Ancient Egypt and Greece (Oxford).

Hill, J, ‘Bes’, Ancient Egypt Online, 2010 https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/bes/ Accessed: 18 December 2020.

Jones, Cerys R, ‘Simply the Bes: 7 reasons Bes should be your favourite Egyptian god’, 6 April 2019 https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/researchers-in-museums/2019/04/06/simply-the-bes-7-reasons-bes-should-be-your-favourite-egyptian-god/comment-page-1/ Accessed: 18 December 2020.

Lendering, Jona, ‘Bes’, Livius.org, created in 2019; last modified on 16 April 2020 https://www.livius.org/articles/religion/bes/ Accessed: 18 December 2020.

Mark, Joshua J., ‘Bes’, Ancient History Encyclopedia, 07 November 2016  https://www.ancient.eu/Bes/ Accessed: 18 December 2020.

Sooke, Alastair, ‘How Egyptian god Bes gave the Christian Devil his looks’, 21st October 2014 https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20130619-how-the-devil-got-his-looks Accessed: 18 December 2020.

Friday 11 December 2020

Being a Disabled Lover.... of History


 

Welcome to my latest blog post. I know I said I would be moving on to beliefs about disability this week. However, I fear I may have bitten off more than I can chew. You see, the topic is more complex than I imagined it in my head when I was planning it. It is taking me a while to piece the puzzle together, but it should be ready for next week. In the meantime, I have decided to give you an insight into the conflicting world of being disabled and a history lover. Unlike every other post I have written, I am making this one up as I’m typing, so I have no idea what I am going to say next.

Access to Records

As you have probably guessed by now, I enjoy learning and writing about history. (If I didn’t, you wouldn’t be reading this). There is just one tiny problem: history involves several old things. A shocker, I know! I think I should clarify the difference between history and archaeology. If I can recall my first week of university correctly, history uses written sources to analyses the past, whereas archaeology relies on physical objects, such as pottery. Does anyone else have the Indiana Jones music stuck in their head right now? Anyway, when studying history, it requires reading several books. As is well known, books are kept in libraries. However, libraries (the physical buildings) are not always accessible. You cannot just stroll into the library and pick out a book. At least not without knocking a few shelves over in the process.

Also, have you ever tried opening and reading a book that is several hundred years old when you have poor hand function? It’s giving me heart palpitations just thinking about it. Luckily for me, scanners exist, so I can have a digital version of a book on my computer. However, this is not always a possibility. This is particularly the case when it comes to historical records. I know that accessing records is not a disability specific problem. Some records are very old and therefore the institutions are understandably hesitant to let any Joe Blogs wander off the street and access them. The problem for me as a wheelchair user is that travelling around to visit various records isn’t that easy and that is before actually trying to enter the building. I know that certain records are online and there are projects working on digitizing more, but it is a slow process. Basically, what I am trying to say in a very long-winded fashion is that almost everything I research for this blog is limited to what I can find online using [insert preferred search engine here].



Pompeii with Vesuvius in the background (Wikimedia Commons)
Pompeii with Vesuvius in the background (Wikimedia Commons)

Access to Historical Sites

As I am an avid lover of history, I could spend all day in museums and at historical sites. In fact, I often wish I could live in a place like the British Museum, London, permanently. I’m sure there is a spare sarcophagus I could sleep in. I also enjoy visiting historical, particularly ancient, sites. However, being a wheelchair user raises several issues. Obviously, the Romans did not build Pompeii with wheelchair users in mind. Therefore, only a small percentage of the (giant) city is wheelchair friendly. If I can remember correctly, they have added ramps etc. in certain areas. The disabled part of me (wait isn’t that all of me?) was jumping for joy at being able to access sites I had read about for years. However, the history loving part of me was deeply troubled.

You see, the people who look after these sites usually do not get enough funding. When you combine this with the amount of people who pay a visit every year, many sites will be completely destroyed by wear and tear in a matter of years. Trying to adapt these sites to make them wheelchair accessible is only making things worse. To clarify, I am thinking of ancient sites that are already ruins. I know it sounds like I’m saying wheelchair users shouldn’t visit ancient sites. That’s because that is exactly what I am saying. However, it is not just wheelchair users that shouldn’t visit ancient sites. I feel that in order to properly preserve ancient sites, they should be closed to the public. Instead, I think technologies such as virtual reality should be used to allow visitors to explore sites. I know that this will probably never happen, but one can always dream.


To keep up to date with my latest blog posts, you can like my Facebook page, or follow me on Twitter. You can find them by clicking the relevant icons in the sidebar.


After that rant, it is probably best to stick with relaying information I have researched. Next week I may or may not start my series on the history of beliefs surrounding disability. I guess you will just have to read it to find out.

                                                                           The Wheelchair Historian